USPTO serial 75233992
MEAL EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEAL EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I FELDMAN
MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared foods from applicant's restaurants for consumption on or off the premises, namely, roasted and rotisserie chicken; chicken parts; turkey; ham; meat loaf; prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; cole slaw; hot and cold vegetable, garden and fruit salads; soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pot pies; hot and cold macaroni, pasta and rice salads; chicken sandwiches; bakery goods; all from applicant's restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |