USPTO serial 75234046
E DOMAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E DOMAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL R RICHARDSON
870 MARKET ST STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computer services, namely, providing computerized on-line retail and ordering services for others to enable third-party retailers to market their goods and services in the field of computers, computer peripherals and software; providing on-line commercial directory information concerning suppliers of computers, computer peripherals and software | ABANDONED | Jan 8, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |