USPTO serial 75234112
TRAVEL CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAVEL CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN A CAHILL
KEVIN A CAHILL SULLIVAN WERTZ MCDADE & WALLACE945 4TH AVESAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | franchising, namely, offering technical or business advice in the establishment and operation of independent travel clinics which provide travel health information and treatment to patients and customers; marketing services, namely, providing marketing consultation to independent travel clinics which provide travel health information and treatment to patients and customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | cable television, satellite transmission, radio, telephone, interactive television and/or computer networks or a series of interconnecting or interlinking computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARE WARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARE WARE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRAVEL CARE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |