USPTO serial 75234178
WORKMANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKMANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-71065 Sindelfingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay L. Collins
WILLIAM W COCHRAN LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM W COCHRAN, LLCSTE 2303555 STANFORD RDFT COLLINS, CO 80525Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, computer programs and databases, for product data management, workflow management and task distribution, particularly in computer-aided design systems; devices for storing or executing such computer software, particularly magnetic/electronic/optical disks and cards and computer software for teaching about product data managment, workflow management and task distribution in computer-aided design systems stored on electronic, magnetic or optical media | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed material relating to product data management, workflow management and distribution in computer-aided design systems, in particular newsletters, periodicals, pamphlets, books, catalogs, reprints of articles, data sheets, product and system application notes, technical bulletins, produts and system operating and service manuals; instruction manuals and books for teaching product data management, workflow management and task distribution in computer-aided design systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer programming services in the field of product data management, workflow management, task distribution and computer aided design of mechanical and electromechanical parts, products and components, including the making and maintenance of computer programs and databases for information and data processing; consulting and engineering services for computer product data management, workflow management, task distribution and computer aided design systems of mechanical and electromechanical parts, products and components, including the drawing up of customer-specific solutions and the combination of systems components; and providing information regarding use of computer product data management, workflow management, task distribution and computer aided design systems of mechanical and electromechanical parts, products and components, including the drawing up of customer-specific solutions and the combination of system components to users via telephone and on-line computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |