USPTO serial 75234210
CELLSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-72622 Nurtingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FELIX J D'AMBROSIO
FELIX J D'AMBROSIO JONES TULLAR & COOPER PCP O BOX 2266ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | diagnostic reagents for scientific or research use, namely, sera | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | diagnostic reagents for clinical medical laboratory use, namely, sera | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | metering devices and pipetting aids | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | products for cell culturing and accessories therefore (not made of metal), namely, cell scrapers and inoculation loops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Greiner GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named CELLSTAR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |