USPTO serial 75234256
ZORIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2419403Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2001
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZORIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
Midwest City, OK
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc A. Brockhaus
MARC A BROCKHAUS DUNLAP, CODDING & ROGERS, PCCUSTOMER N 30589 PO BOX 16370OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radios, audio headphones and earphones and audio tape recorders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZORIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Zorix International L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by ZORIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZORIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ZORIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |