USPTO serial 75234324
LAWN BOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAWN BOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEREK KAESGEN
LINDA M BYRNE MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power-operated lawn and garden equipment, namely, riding mowers, leaf shredders, lawn vacuums, walk-behind mowers, self propelled mowers, side discharge mowers, convertible mowers, rear discharge mowers, side discharge high wheel mowers, mulching mowers, electric mowers, chipper/shredders, front and rear tine tillers, edgers, log splitters, snow throwers, two-stage snow throwers, track drive snow throwers and service parts for all the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |