Drawing for VIRTUAL PROP SHOP

USPTO serial 75234425

VIRTUAL PROP SHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL PROP SHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROSE AUSLANDER

ROSE AUSLANDER CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN2 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, computer software, database libraries, and data sets used to rapidly configure virtual reality sets for the television, movie, entertainment and multi-media industries, distributed primarily through high-volume platform sales outlets and not through proprietary trade channelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 3, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 22, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance