Drawing for THE INTERACTION METHOD

USPTO serial 75236486

THE INTERACTION METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE INTERACTION METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE W SCHWAB

Brian L. Michaelis Seyfarth Shaw LLPTwo Seaport Lane, Suite 300Seyfarth Shaw LLPBoston, MA 02210-2028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting seminars and workshops relating to meeting facilitation, group problem solving, productivity improvement, innovation planning, conflict resolution and implementing change in the work placeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 27, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance