USPTO serial 75236923
BRITAJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITAJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of disorders of the central nervous system | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | hypodermic needles, syringes and other apparatus and instruments for injecting or otherwise administering pharmaceutical preparations in patients; fluid or powder injectors for use in medical equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Britannia Pharmaceuticals Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Britannia Pharmaceuticals Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BRITAJECT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |