Drawing for EUREKA PIZZA

USPTO serial 75237008

EUREKA PIZZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2293867Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 23, 1999
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with EUREKA PIZZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant services, namely, restaurants featuring home delivery, carryout, and catering servicesACTIVEFeb 15, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2019NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 15, 201989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 15, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2019E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 25, 201189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 23, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 25, 2011PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
May 25, 2011PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
May 3, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2011PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 10, 2009PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Feb 19, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 200989AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Feb 17, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 18, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 17, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 14, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 15, 200615AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 22, 200515AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Nov 22, 2005E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Oct 5, 2005ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance