USPTO serial 75237611
LUMBERJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMBERJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN C LEE
STEPHEN C LEE FAEGER & BENSON LLP2200 NORWEST CTR90 S 17TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | chain saws and parts thereof; power limb trimmers and parts thereof; and chain saw chain sharpeners and parts thereof | ACTIVE | Jun 27, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |