USPTO serial 75238361
OBVIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 2002
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OBVIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA
Menlo Park, CA
Dublin 2, IE
Dublin 2, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MILES J ALEXANDER
MILES J ALEXANDER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing global computer network transmission services for others in connection with the distribution of software and video materials via E-mail and the global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | maintenance of computer software and monitoring the computer systems of others and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obvious Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Obvious Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Transcom Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Transcom Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OBVIOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |