USPTO serial 75238610
RAMBLING TED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAMBLING TED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aberford, West Yorkshire, GB
Aberford, West Yorkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M EICHLER
PETER M EICHLER TROOP STEUBER PASICH REDDICK & TOBEY LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E 24TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | posters, notebooks, binders, daily organizers, memopads, pens, pencils, stickers, erasers, comic books, pencil cases, playing cards, writing paper, paper weights, paper coasters, paper mats, newspapers, periodicals and books in the field of children's stories and child-care, mounted and unmounted photographs, postcards, trading cards, stand-up cutouts, pre-paid phone debit cards, milk caps, personal checks | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |