USPTO serial 75238634
SURFACEGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 1999
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SURFACEGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Seal Beach, CA
Seal Beach, CA
Seal Beach, CA
ATLANTA, GA
CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Noor E. Bahhur
Noor E. Bahhur Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP41 South High StreetSuite 2900Columbus, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | preparations for protecting and sealing, namely, sealer coatings for use on natural stone, tile and porous masonry surfaces | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Custom Building Products
- Other trademarks owned by Custom Building Products
- Other trademarks owned by Custom Building Products
- Other trademarks owned by CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named SURFACEGARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 6, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |