Drawing for DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75238745

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer monitors and projection monitorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 19, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 10, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 10, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 6, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 28, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance