USPTO serial 75238762
AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2384273Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2000
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Business Finance Corporation
Oklahoma City, OK
Other trademarks owned by American Business Finance Corporation
American Business Finance Corporation
Oklahoma City, OK
Other trademarks owned by American Business Finance Corporation
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
EDMOND, OK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, factoring and financing of accounts receivable | EXPIRED | Feb 6, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Business Finance Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by American Business Finance Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by FCC, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |