Drawing for B O S T O N M A R K E T  BOSTON HEARTH SPECIALTY FOODS

USPTO serial 75239487

B O S T O N M A R K E T BOSTON HEARTH SPECIALTY FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2551400Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 26, 2002
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with B O S T O N M A R K E T BOSTON HEARTH SPECIALTY FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029prepared foods from applicant's restaurants for consumption on or off the premises, namely, roasted and rotisserie chicken; chicken parts; turkey; ham; meat loaf; prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; cole slaw; hot and cold vegetable, garden and fruit saladsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1996
030pot pies; hot and cold macaroni, pasta and rice salads; chicken, turkey, ham and meatloaf sandwiches; bakery goods; all from applicant's restaurantsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 3, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Jan 16, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 17, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 26, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 24, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2001PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Jul 16, 2001PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Oct 10, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 5, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 4, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 18, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance