USPTO serial 75239578
MACOMB COUNTY BUILDERS FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 1999
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MACOMB COUNTY BUILDERS FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN, INC.
WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI
Other trademarks owned by HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN, INC.
Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
Farmington Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
Farmington Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | association services, namely, promoting the interests of members of the building industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
- Other trademarks owned by Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MACOMB COUNTY BUILDERS FORUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |