USPTO serial 75240085
ASSOCIATION OF GENERATION X'ERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASSOCIATION OF GENERATION X'ERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY JO BERTANI
MARY JO BERTANI HAVERSTOCK GARRETT & ROBERTS611 OLIVE STST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Case, Lindsay J.
- Other trademarks owned by Case, Lindsay J.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASSOCIATION OF GENERATION X'ERS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |