USPTO serial 75240137
CAROLYN TAYLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAROLYN TAYLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPORTSGIRL SPORTSCRAFT GROUP PTY. LIMITED
Hawthorne East, Victoria, 3123, AU
Other trademarks owned by SPORTSGIRL SPORTSCRAFT GROUP PTY. LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, dresses, skirts, cardigans, jumpers, vests, blouses, slacks, robes, shorts, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, suits, coats, knitwear, swimwear, underwear; clothing accessories, namely, belts, gloves and scarves; footwear, namely, hosiery (excluding pantyhose), socks, shoes, sandals, boots and slippers; headgear, namely, hats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |