USPTO serial 75240197
ST. JOHN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ST. JOHN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERRY J VISCOUNTY
PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglass chains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |