USPTO serial 75240563
NIKE BAR AND RESTAURANT EXTRAORDINAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIKE BAR AND RESTAURANT EXTRAORDINAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C WRAY
1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | food and beverage services, namely, food preparation, distribution and serving, restaurant, cocktail lounge and catering services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |