USPTO serial 75240572
BOTTOM UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOTTOM UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES H JOHNSON
3918 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | watering systems of all kinds, including systems for providing water for irrigation purposes, root zone watering and above ground watering, particularly of pot plants; fertigation systems; systems for providing gases such as oxygen and nitrogen to the roots of plants; systems for draining soils; parts and accessories for all of the aforesaid goods in this class being goods | ABANDONED | Aug 23, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |