USPTO serial 75241391
THINKLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINKLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J HELLER
WILLIAM J HELLER HANNOCH WEISMAN4 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068-3788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computer support and maintenance; services; user group services; and computer system training services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services in the field of computers and computer software, namely, computer software end user group services; the promotion and enhancement of communication regarding Think Systems Corporation software; the promotion and enhancement of communication between Think Systems Corporation and its clients, users, licensees, and potential licensees; the offering of a forum in which Think Systems Corporation and end users define, prioritize, and respond to product development needs ranging from software error correction to new enhancements and strategic direction for future versions of Think Systems Corporation Software; to provide educational opportunities for computer professionals, including information about hardware, networks, and vendor strategic alliances and direction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |