USPTO serial 75241402
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIDGET GRIFFIN JOHNSON
BRIDGET GRIFFIN JOHNSON MARY KAY INC16251 DALLAS PKWYDALLAS, TX 75248UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | shop at home parties featuring cosmetics and skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of skin care, beauty care, and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information and advice in the field of skin care, beauty care and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1999 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |