Drawing for DCP

USPTO serial 75242114

DCP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DCP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARSHA STOLT

MARSHA STOLT DAIN RAUSCHERFISH & RICHARDSON PC PA60 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4400

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING PROVIDED BY EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE COMPLETED SPECIALIZED TRAINING IN THE SUBJECTACTIVEJun 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 20, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 10, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance