USPTO serial 75242220
CIMVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIMVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR S GARRETT
ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES USING A REAL TIME DATABASE WORKING ON STANDARD PERSONAL COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |