USPTO serial 75242691
CREATING DISTINCTIVE COMMUNICATIONS. ACHIEVING RESULTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREATING DISTINCTIVE COMMUNICATIONS. ACHIEVING RESULTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S SUMNERS
JOHN S SUMNERS MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | preparing advertisements, promotional materials and audio visual presentations for use in advertising for others, marketing and public relations consulting services, marketing communications consulting services and dissemination of advertising for others via on-line electronic communications network | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | electronic media duplication of data and digital information | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | preparing and producing films and videos for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | graphic and interactive multimedia design services, consultation services with regard to new product and service naming, design services, namely, graphic design, industrial and product design, package design for others, fashion and textile design for others, furniture design, exhibition space and kiosk design, creating and technical writing services for others, music composition and transcription for others, computer services, namely, computer consulting, computer software and hardware design, selection and systems integration for others, and computer animation design and related electronic production for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Larsen Design Office, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Larsen Design Office, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CREATING DISTINCTIVE COMMUNICATIONS. ACHIEVING RESULTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |