USPTO serial 75242704
ZA'HAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZA'HAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A MUNCK
WILLIAM A MUNCK HITT CHWANG & GAINER PC225 UNIVERSITY PLZ275 W CAMPBELL RDRICHARDSON, TX 25080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair shampoos, hair conditioners, skin care products, namely, suntan lotions, sunscreen lotions, skin moisturizing creams, skin packs, skin oils and lotions, eye creams, hand creams, foot creams, exfoliating preparations, mud masques, makeup removers, body and facial soaps, body and facial cleansers, non-medicated bath salts, personal deodorants, and toothpastes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |