USPTO serial 75243063
LOE-NOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOE-NOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THADDIUS J CARVIS
ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical additives, namely, for emulsifying water with distillate fuels, such as diesel and home heating oil, to form light oil emulsions for increasing fuel economy and/or reducing nitrogen oxide emissions, namely, mixtures of Nox-reducing chemicals, water and surfactants, emulsifiers and/or coupling agents effective for mixing with diesel fuel or home heating oil, to form light oil emulsions | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | fuel for motor vehicles, namely, diesel fuels in the form of light oil emulsions, and home heating oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | mechanical mixing machines, namely, mixers used to combine chemical fuel additives with diesel fuel or home heating oil, to form light oil emulsions, equipped with an emulsification device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |