USPTO serial 75243431
WAZOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAZOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
URBAN JUICE & SODA COMPANY LTD.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
URBAN JUICE & SODA COMPANY LTD.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A. JENSEN
ROBERT A JENSEN JENSEN & PUNTIGAM, PS2033 6TH AVE STE 1020SEATTLE, WA 98121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wearing apparel, namely, T-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, polo shirts, jackets, denim shirts, vests, boxer shorts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit juices, fruit flavoured soft drinks, soft drink colas, soft drinks flavoured with tea, fruit nectars, fruit punch, lemonade and sports drinks; bottled water, namely, spring water, soda water, seltzer water, mineral water, caffeinated water, aerated water, lithia water and quinine water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN JUICE & SODA COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN JUICE & SODA COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named WAZOOM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |