USPTO serial 75244008
PROCENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2970827Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROCENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
BOCA RATON, FL
BOCA RATON, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | customer service call center products, namely, telephone switches; computer terminals; computers; computer application programs, namely, customer service call center management software for administration, configuration scheduling and reporting; customer service call center reporting software; call distribution software; outgoing call placement software; software for interfacing between computers and telephone equipment; software for implementing voice response systems; computers for implementing voice response systems; client server software applications for processing multimedia data, such as, web based transactions, electronic mail, facsimile and video; telephone modems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PROCENTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |