USPTO serial 75244407
COMPLETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPLETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEN J PEDERSEN
KEN J PEDERSEN PEDERSEN & COMPANY, LLCP O BOX 2666BOISE, ID 83701-2666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Engine fuel system cleaner chemical additive | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Entech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Entech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Energy Release Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named COMPLETE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |