USPTO serial 75245309
MILLENNIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK QUALITY REVIEW
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACY L TAYLOR
STACY L TAYLOR FISH & RICHARDSON PC4225 EXECUTIVE SQ STE 1400LA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits, namely, a system of high speed switches for use in a local area network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |