USPTO serial 75246009
KRYPTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRYPTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, GB
Hasingstoke, Hampshire, GB
Hasingstoke, Hampshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A OLIFF
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGEP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, PERIPHERALS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SORTING, VERIFYING, AUTHENTICATING, HANDLING, PROCESSING, MONITORING, IDENTIFYING, DETECTING CODED MARKINGS, IMPREGNATIONS AND FEATURES, AND FOR DETECTING COUNTERFEITS IN DOCUMENTS, SECURITY PAPER, PRINTED SECURITY PAPER, SECURITY PRINTED MATTER AND PRINTED SECURITY MATTER; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING INTERFACES FOR HARDWARE FOR COLLECTING, INTEGRATING AND ANALYZING FINANCIAL DATA IN THE BANKING AND FINANCIAL INDUSTRY; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | SECURITY PAPER AND DOCUMENTS, NAMELY BANKNOTES, TRAVELERS' CHECKS, IDENTITY CARDS, FINANCIAL BONDS, CERTIFICATES, PASSPORTS, PASSBOOKS, LICENSES, PERMITS, TICKETS, BANK CHECKS, CHECK BOOKS, SECURITY PRINTED CARDS, PRINTED SECURITY CARDS, VOUCHERS, TRANSPORTATION TICKETS, ENTRANCE TICKETS, PRINTED SEALS, LABELS, LABELS FOR INDICATING AUTHENTICITY, LABELS USED FOR BRANDING AND EVIDENCING EXCISE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID, SECURITY TAGGED PAPER, WATERMARKED PAPER, THREADED PAPER, CHEMICALLY TREATED PAPER, AND PHOTOGRAPHS, AND PAPER FOR PRINTING THE FOREGOING AND SECURITY THREADS FOR USE IN THE FOREGOING AND IN MONETARY TOKENS AND CURRENCY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas De La Rue Limited
- Other trademarks owned by De La Rue International Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by De La Rue International Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named KRYPTAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |