Drawing for SALAD BAR SELECT

USPTO serial 75246815

SALAD BAR SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALAD BAR SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK C STEPHENSON

MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC1400 1 CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029sliced, cubed, diced and/or cut ham, roast beef, chicken and/or turkey; shredded and/or cubed cheese; shredded, chopped, cut, washed and/or trimmed lettuce and vegetables; vegetable salads; dips; vegetable salads and create-your-own salad kits consisting of ham, roast beef, chicken, turkey, cheese, lettuce, vegetables, croutons, salad dressing, toast, pieces of toast, breadsticks, breadstuffs, salsa and/or tortilla chips; soup and soup mixesABANDONED—
030croutons; toast; pieces of toast; breadsticks; breadstuffs; tortilla chips; salsa and salad dressingsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance