Drawing for SPIDER FIGHTER

USPTO serial 75246916

SPIDER FIGHTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIDER FIGHTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H COX

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH ET AL757 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005insecticides for domestic useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 12, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 23, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 16, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance