Drawing for NUCLEUS STOCK AUDIT

USPTO serial 75247109

NUCLEUS STOCK AUDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUCLEUS STOCK AUDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL C. MAIER

MICHAEL C MAIER MOORE USA INC300 LANG BLVDGRAND ISLAND, NY 14072UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software designed to manage warehouse inventories and computer hardware used therewith, namely, bar code readers and user manuals sold therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 14, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 8, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance