USPTO serial 75247700
MEDIARECALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIARECALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IN THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, J8Z 1W8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy Machaalany
Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multimedia computer software and CD-ROMs used to scan local and network drives, to access a global computer network, to retouch graphic images, and to interface with other computer programs and instructional manuals therefor, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |