USPTO serial 75247834
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING DATA EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING DATA EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B RITCHIE
STEPHEN R URIART D'ALESSANDRO & RITCHIEP O BOX 640640SAN JOSE, CA 95164-0640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software containing a set of standardized data elements for semiconductor manufacturing processes and a set of protocols for communicating those data elements, namely, nomenclature for products, inventory data, process control data, defect data, device electrical data, non-lot data, build information, capacity data, in-transit shipping information, accounting information, specifications, and manufacturing instructions that will be made available to outside parties to be utilized by outside parties in outside party computer software and computer software instruction manuals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |