Drawing for Serial No. 75248571

USPTO serial 75248571

Serial No. 75248571

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMILTON, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75248571?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V VICKERS

ROBERT V VICKERS VICKERS DANIELS & YOUNG50 PUBLIC SQ - STE 2000CLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal locksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 13, 2004UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 16, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 1998PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 6, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance