USPTO serial 75249125
TRUFLEX/PANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUFLEX/PANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J CONNORS
JOHN J CONNORS CONNORS & ASSOCIATES1600 DOVE ST STE 220NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2427UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | adhesives, namely, rubber cements and compounds for use in industrial applications and featuring adhesives for use in the rubber tire industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | automotive tire and tube repair materials, namely, tube and tire repair kits, composed of a plastic box with a tube of cement, metal abrading disk to buff tire tube surface, repair patches, and instruction sheet; patches for tube and tire repairs; tubless tire puncture repair kits composed of a plastic box with a tube of cement, metal abrading disk to buff tire inside surface, repair patches, instruction sheet; quick patches for tube and tire repairs; bias ply tire section repair units, namely, patches to repair injuries in bias ply casing; radial tire nail hole repair kits composed of a plastic box with a tube of cement, metal abrading disk for buffing radial tire inside casing surface, radial repair patches and instruction sheet; bias ply tire repair units, namely, reinforced patches for repair of injuries in bias tire casing; and radial tire repair units, namely, reinforced for repair of injuries in radial tire casing | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | industrial rubber products, namely, rubber lining to cover metal chutes and inside metal tanks for protection against gravel and ore; sheeting chute lining and pulley lagging; rubber covering for driven and non driven pulleys all for use in the further manufacture of drive pulleys for industrial conveyor belts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Truflex Rubber Products Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named TRUFLEX/PANG
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |