USPTO serial 75249195
JUNGLENUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUNGLENUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toluca Lake, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L BEARD, ESQ
JOHN L BEARD ESQ MERCHANT AND GOULD90 S 7TH ST STE 3100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | cartoons, cartoon strips on paper, comic strips on paper, posters, playing cards, notepads, art paper, filler paper, diaries, calendars, pencils, crayons, cardboard, wrapping paper, mounted photographs, unmounted photographs, stationery, adhesives for stationary or household purposes, pictures, packing paper, paper boxes, cardboard boxes, paper bags | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 1987 |
| 025 | clothing, namely, jackets, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, jeans, shorts, vests, ties, boxer shorts, shirts, leggings, bodysuits, sweaters, dresses and skirts | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |