Drawing for MILLENNIUM

USPTO serial 75249723

MILLENNIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAPHNE GRONICH, Esq.

FOX GROUPP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded video cassettes, pre-recorded video tapes, pre-recorded videodiscs, pre-recorded audio cassettes, pre-recorded audio tapes, pre-recorded audio discs, and pre-recorded CD-ROMs, all featuring entertainment related to a live action, fictional drama television series about a secret law enforcement group fighting the forces of darknessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 24, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 7, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 5, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance