USPTO serial 75249744
UB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS L THOMTE
DENNIS L THOMTE ZARLEY MCKEE THOMTE VOORHEES & SEASE801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking and trust services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |