USPTO serial 75250166
BIEN ENTREGADO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2000
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIEN ENTREGADO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ELEKTRA DEL MILENIO, S.A. DE C.V.
COLONIA TLALPAN CP, MX
Colonia Tlalpan CP, 14000, MX
Colonia Tlalpan CP, 14000, MX
Colonia Tlalpan CP, 14000, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. RODMAN STEELE, JR.
J. RODMAN STELE JR AKERMAN SENTERFITT222 LAKEVIEW AVENUEFOURTH FLOORWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-6183Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | transportation of goods for others by truck, train, air and ship | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELEKTRA DEL MILENIO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named BIEN ENTREGADO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |