USPTO serial 75250170
HEADLINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEADLINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thornhill, Ontario L3T 5W7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINE HOANG
CHRISTINE HOANG FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in accessing, retrieving, distributing, displaying, editing, selecting, and/or providing information, data, and/or graphics from a global computer information network, from online database/s, from internal computer network/s, and/or from other computer database/s | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services, namely, the design and implementation of software for accessing, retrieving, distributing, displaying, editing, selecting, and/or providing information, data, and/or graphics from a global computer information network, from online database/s, from internal computer network/s, and/or from other computer database/s; computer programming, software design for others, and computer program implementation services; the selection and provision of information, data, and/or graphics from a web sites on a global computer information network, from online database/s, from internal computer network/s, and/or from other computer database/s | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |