USPTO serial 75250619
THE INCREDIBLY EASY WAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE INCREDIBLY EASY WAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cambridge, MA
Somerville, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M MULHOLLAND
SUSAN M MULHOLLAND LUCASH GESMER & UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software operating systems in the nature of non-downloadable or downloadable software programs; computer software application suites consisting of programs for use in word processing, games, desktop publishing, electronic spreadsheets, graphics, drawing, address storage and retrieval, database access, access to global information networks and utility programs in the nature of non-downloadable or downloadable computer software programs | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |