Drawing for THE LOCALIZER

USPTO serial 75250837

THE LOCALIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE LOCALIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD P KELLY

EDWARD P KELLY FELFE & LYNCH805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009sounding apparatus and instruments, auditory, visual and audio-visual warning devices, namely, for identifying the direction of devices on vehicles, ships, aricraft, exit routes, security items and personnel; sirens, alarms, namely, for fire, burglar, security and personnel (sighted and visually impaired) safety in buildings, vehicles, ships and aircraft, alarm systems, comprised of sound emmitting devices and/or control boxes; alarm apparatus, alarm instruments and alarm installations, namely, for fire, burglar, security and personnel (sighted and visually impaired) safety in buildings; vehicles, ships and aircraft, sound pattern generators; sound beacons, namely, for fire, burglar, security and personnel (sighted and visually impaired) safety in buildings, vehicles, ships and aircraft for generating and/or controlling and/or managing and/or signalling alarms; apparatus and instruments for use in acoustics and/or acoustic applications, namely, for identifying the direction of devices on vehicles, ships, aircraft, exit routes, security items and personnel; loudspeakers, amplifiers, acoustic transducers; apparatus and instruments for generating and/or amplifying and/or emitting sound, namely, for identifying the direction of devices on vehicles, ships, aircraft, exit routes, security items and personnel; apparatus and instruments for recording and/or transmitting and/or reproducing sound and/or images, namely, for identifying the direction of devices on vehicles, ships, aircraft, exit routes, security items and personnel; radio papers; paging apparatus and instruments, computer hardware; computer software for directional sound in the field of fire, burglar, security and personnel sighted and visually impaired) safety in buildings, vehicles, ships and aircraft, parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance